How Brands Should Behave on Social Media During a Tragedy

By , 14 December, 2012, 18 Comments

The unbelievably tragic and gut wrenching events of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut are still unfolding as I write this. At this time we know that 27 people have been killed and of them, 18 are children. With the exception of tears, prayer, telling my family that I love them and writing this I’m having a hard time focusing on anything else. When something like this occurs, our world’s become smaller, our humanity surfaces, and there is an overwhelming sense to connect and experience our emotions together. In this day and age, social media serves as the most powerful and effective way to band together.

как может уволиться член правления какое наказание за проезд на знак формы защиты собственности в рф выплата ущерба за дтп суд изменения счета в году сколько собственников у приватизированной квартиры что нужно иметь иностранцу что бы работать в рк лишение прав и окончание срока их действия дисциплинарное наказание в период отпуска уголовный кодекс сроки давности нотариус гражданский время работы отсутствие активов для выплаты доли

Companies and brands, like people, have personas and are active on social media. The vast difference between people and brands is that part of brand personas include content that either promotes a product/service or genres of content related to their product/service to ultimately impact their bottom line. Every brand has varying strategies for why they’re in social, what they’re trying to accomplish and how they go about accomplishing it. A fundamental element of the how for any brand is content. Some brands schedule this content and moderate it sporadically and others take a more hands on approach, having a community manager who serves not only as content creator and curator, but as the spokesperson of the community; often someone good at emulating company values and beliefs online (which is what you should be doing, but that’s for another post). While being shocked about the events of today, another shocker has been watching several brands that clearly have automated their social media process to the point that they’ve posted careless branded content in the midst of this tragic event and been completely non-responsive to their communities who’ve commented on it.

On the flip side, I also saw the best response to a tragic event on Facebook and Twitter from any brand I’ve ever seen. Vitamix, a product I’m proud to own, posted the following on Facebook and Twitter:

Screen Shot 2012-12-14 at 1.30.52 PM

Vitamix Tweet

 

 

 

 

 

 

Talk about a phenomenal response from a brand. They:

  • Acknowledged the tragic events that took place today
  • Notified their community that they would cease posting regular content, and
  • Gave their community the channels to use in the event customer service was needed

To top it off, after seeing this in my Twitter and Facebook feeds, I shared a tweet and Facebook post commending Vitamix’s efforts. Shortly after, I received a DM from Vitamix’s community manager, Jenn Vojta, who shared with me that she misspelled Newtown, Newton and had reposted. I told her that her misspelling was null and void and commended her personally for setting a great example for mar comm folks and she responded with, “Thank you. We really appreciate it. One of our core values is family and we felt we needed to respect it.” That’s brand purpose and company alignment you just can’t fake (more fodder for later).

What I’ve seen from brands today is a great reminder that in this new age of marketing communications, applying the old one-way messaging strategies of yesteryear to modern mediums can have a really negative impact on your brand. In addition, human tragedies and Acts of God are sadly becoming more common occurrences these days, and like crisis communications plans, are something brands need to plan for. In addition to the branded content issue, does it make sense for you to acknowledge the event or will it come off that you’re trying to insert yourself unnecessarily in a conversation? Each brand has different values and beliefs that apply when our national (and in some cases global) community is at odds. There’s no substitution for defining what you stand for as a brand and getting your organization to rally around it in everything you do in order to effectively communicate internally and externally during a time like this. Here are a few ideas/things to consider:

Know Who You Are! 
If you don’t have a solid brand identity, then get busy working on one. It’s pretty hard to emulate one if you don’t know what it is. In Vitamix’s case, their community manager was able to tell me that one of its values was family, which makes perfect sense that they would acknowledge and react as they did. What an organization believes and values is integral to being effective in general, but if it’s faulty it will come to light in your internal and external communications which has a different impact these days than it used to.

Call a Quick Team Meeting to Determine the Communications Plan
When a tragic event hits, get together with your communications team to determine what course of action you’ll take and how that effects any content dissemination and conversation plans, from sending a press release to content going on Facebook, Twitter or other social media. What is the company/brand stance? Should you acknowledge the event with condolences on your communications channels? Or is it best to remain silent. What is the messaging?

Cease Posting Any Scheduled Content
If you do nothing else, pull the plug on regularly scheduled content. Posting sales specials, asking your community to do a survey and any other marketing messages are not best practice during a time like this. Sure, some people may not notice or care, but you don’t want to be “that guy.”

There is much to add. What say you?

Hug your family. Tell them you love them. Talk about this tragedy with them, no matter how small they are. Carve out some time to think of about the victims and their families.

email
  • Pingback: google

  • Pingback: google

  • Pingback: Brand Engagement in A Time of Tragedy | Gina Rau

  • http://twitter.com/CatieRagusa Catie Ragusa

    You’re very welcome. Hopefully brands will take your advice to heart now in these troubling times.

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Glad you think so. Thanks for reading and commenting Catie!

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    I couldn’t agree more. There is such a huge learning curve with social media and I think you find out very quickly who what brands have a sound strategy and good humans executing it. As for your question, I think tomorrow would be fine. It’s that immediate day or two of impact (varies depending on the event) that brands really need to be concerned with. Best of luck. Thanks for reading and commenting:-)

  • wfbliz

    It’s sad that your post is relevant again today. I have just started managing daily email communication and a FB page for a small company. We have a big event approaching on Saturday. In your opinion how soon is too soon to go back to pushing FB content for that event?

  • http://twitter.com/CatieRagusa Catie Ragusa

    Lisa, what great advice!  With the thousands of news-related tweets/posts going out at the time of the tragedy, it’s difficult to comprehend that brands would not show due respect to the families and victims.

    These are great ideas for any tragic occurence.  Thanks for sharing.

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Well said. Thanks for reading and commenting, Jana! 

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Thanks for reading and commenting:-) 

  • http://twitter.com/ginarau ginarau

    I totally agree, Lisa. As soon as the news was released, we pulled all scheduled messages through the weekend, and sent one post similar to VItamix. 

    It’s important for brands to remember the context within which their message is viewed. When I worked on a big, family brand with golden arches long ago, we had a policy of not placing spots in any violent content because you don’t want your brand associated with the emotions the viewer might be feeling at commercial break. 

    Same thing happens in social media – when tragedy hits and people turn to social media for updates or comfort, the last thing you want them to see is your hard pitch. Brands, like people, need to be aware of context and have the confidence to quickly respond to situations.

  • http://twitter.com/jstLIVN Jana Jeffery

    I’m the Community Manager for Albertson’s LLC and we did the same – remained completely silent on all social / digital channels throughout Friday and the weekend. It was the right thing to do.

    If I received comments, questions on those channels of course I respond to them. But we generated no original content.

    In times of tragedy or bereavement sometimes it’s best to get out of our own way and let the community ebb and flow through the emotions. We have a responsibility not to clutter that human experience. 

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Along with recent experience, our interaction on Friday was the inspiration for this post so thank you. Your perspective helped me think about things a bit differently than I had prior, and I always appreciate that. Thank you for reading and commenting too:-) 

  • wjj

    In the case of 911 or Pearl Harbor, Sandy or Katrina, and now with this shuttering tragedy in CT, the right content is to be respectful (moments of silence) for the world we live in… and honestly, remove the whole notion of “brands.” Corporations can be in intrusive enough to try to make us all “feel” a certain way, as they have a right to do… but in times like these, a general timeout from the game will make us all remember exactly how small and fragil we are…

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    I think this is an awesome question. My preference (in most cases) is to not comment, unless I have business commenting on the event. I’ve worked with brands who’ve partnered with the Red Cross or other charitable orgs during disasters, which qualifies.  To your points here and elsewhere, usually it doesn’t make sense for the brands I represent to do so. I do always advise to cease posting branded content for the day, however always remain active in the community (regular moderation responsibilities). Like your point about humanity. I’m a big fan of “just because you can doesn’t mean you should.” I think it applies to a lot in social and branding, but especially here. Thanks for reading and commenting buddy. Always appreciate your perspective. 

  • http://twitter.com/BrookeMillerIA Brooke Miller

    I represent multiple brands and really appreciate this perspective. Posting anything seemed wrong – I cancelled everything for the weekend. Thanks for sharing!

  • Pingback: Digital Platitudes « nathan t. wright

  • http://www.kaseyskala.com/ Kasey Skala

    Let me ask this question: how long is long enough to be respectful? A day? The weekend?

    As a brand, I’m here to serve my customers. If my customers are talking to me on a social channel, I am going to respond to them. I’m not going to make them jump through hoops and communicate with me on my terms. Do I cut down some promotional talk? Sure, I guess. But to go completely silent for a day or the weekend is nonsense.

    Also, I question the relevance. Why is a brand that isn’t located in CT tweeting about it? You know what makes a brand human? Not trying to force itself into a situation that doesn’t involve them. Be quiet and move on.

    So again, I ask: where’s the line? An hour, a day, a week?

    *This is my personal opinion and not that of the brand I represent.