Dear Marketers: Please Stop Using the Lone Social Media Icon

By , 23 July, 2012, 9 Comments

I’ve resurrected this from blog post purgatory, also known as my draft box. This post has been in draft since 12/11/11 and I thought that marketers using the lone social media icon in really important places they pay a lot of money for (collateral and advertising) would have stopped by now, but in fact it’s only worsened.

как может уволиться член правления какое наказание за проезд на знак формы защиты собственности в рф выплата ущерба за дтп суд изменения счета в году сколько собственников у приватизированной квартиры что нужно иметь иностранцу что бы работать в рк лишение прав и окончание срока их действия дисциплинарное наказание в период отпуска уголовный кодекс сроки давности нотариус гражданский время работы отсутствие активов для выплаты доли

You see it everywhere. The use of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube (insert social icon here) icons with no URL attached and no call to action and/or value proposition. In most places it appears as though marketing departments have checked social media off the list because they threw the Facebook and Twitter, etc. icons on their collateral and advertising. This needs to stop.

Much like we’ve advertised 800 numbers and websites to drive relationships and sales, social media offer us additional places for consumers to interact with our business. It only makes sense that we should communicate this clearly so it doesn’t turn into a missed opportunity. When we put 800 numbers in collateral or advertising, there’s usually a “Call xxx-xxx-xxxx for  X,” a clear destination and call to action of why to call and what you’re going to get when you get there. Similarly, websites are promoted with language like “Visit www.blank.com for X.” We need to be approaching social with the same strategic lens so that we capitalize on the opportunity these communication channels present us. This seems like common sense, but it is not common practice in social media. One of the biggest mistakes I see in [digital] marketing is the assumption that consumers recognize and know how to use new mediums to connect with brands. So, let’s think about them a little bit more when we’re building out our mar comm efforts. It will be better for everyone that way:-)

Let’s look at  few examples:

Walk to End Alzheimer’s TV commercial

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instead of making their advertising dollars go the distance, they’ve chosen to advertise for Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. The lack of putting /alzwalk after the Facebook icon, @alzassociation after the Twitter icon and whatever its YouTube vanity URL is a huge loss because let’s be realistic, few average consumers are going to go search for your presence in those places and let’s say they do, if it’s hard to  find they’ll give up quickly.

Wedding Day Diamonds TV commercial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Once more, this is like dual advertising for Wedding Day Diamonds and Facebook and Twitter.

Suits print ad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lone social icons next to URL.

Belvedere Vodka print ad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lone social icons.

Board up for Lili’s Salon and Spa at The Galleria (mall) in Edina, Minn. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A QR code with the salon website placed above it (so smart) and the Facebook and Twitter vanity URLs above the Facebook and Twitter icons. Well done Lili’s Salon!

Verizon TV commercial

 

 

 

 

 

 

Love the use of Facebook vanity here.

48 Hours episode on CBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48 Hours provides call to action (Chat Now on Facebook) and great links to Facebook and Twitter profiles.

 WCCO News at 10 w/ Jason DeRusha and Liz Collin

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think that Jason and Liz do a great job socializing the Sunday evening news. As part of their segment, they ask the audience to use their hashtag and handles (prominently displayed on the screen long enough for you to absorb it) to answer a question. They then share a few viewer tweets at the end of the broadcast.

Mall of America print and on-mall signage

 

 

 

 

 

When I was at Mall of America, I transformed the lone social media icon into a series of ads for Facebook, Twitter, the MOA Blog and mobile website. The point was to raise awareness of MOA’s social channels, what consumers could expect to find there and the exact road to get there if they so choose. I suggest you do the same. It’s a relatively simple step compared to everything else we do:-)

Social media is still in its infancy and folks are unclear on how to approach its use and how to communication it to their respective audiences. We’re not going to tackle all of that here, but one of the most important projects you can undertake is defining how social fits into your brand’s ecosystem, traditional and digital. Here are a few helpful tips to get started:

  • Define why you’re in social and how that relates back to your mar comm strategy
  • Understand what each social channel (Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Google+, etc.) will represent
  • Develop supporting communication in the appropriate touch points

I know you guys have stuff to add. Please add to the list.

email
Related Posts
  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Leo – Sorry I missed this comment upon posting months ago. On a website, the icons are good enough. I think that some brands do a great job by placing them near widgets pulling in social feeds that allow people to see what they’ll get there. Incentive for the click if you will. As for the rest of this post, it pertains to a multi-channel execution. I think marketers really fail to think about a seamless user experience and putting a random icon up in a print or TV ad without a URL is pure silly. If social becomes part of another channel’s ad or communication message, make clear where to find it (like you would a phone number or website) and in some cases make clear what they’ll find when they get there to incent them. That’s where my head is at with this:-) Thanks for stopping by. 

  • http://ariherzog.com/ Ari Herzog

    Leo, you may know enough about Facebook to recognize the icon — but how will you know how to find the page, especially if it’s a common page name and there are 10 of them with the same name? How do you know which is the company from that ad you saw quickly? You don’t.

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Thanks Gary! I’m glad you enjoyed the post! I couldn’t agree more.

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Thanks;-) 

  • Layalle

    the lone twitter icon underneath your dp doesn’t work, goes to a dead link :( https://twitter.com/http://twitter.com/lulugrimm

  • http:twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Thanks Gary! I couldn’t agree more:-)

  • Garyboye

    Lisa, your post shows extraordinary insight.

    Tools are only as good as the person who truly knows how to use them.

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    You can disagree if you want – that’s a perfectly good thing:-) To clarify – I used a TV/print advertising to illustrate my thoughts here. I wasn’t so much talking about digital, although I think some brands could do a better job of social integration and reciprocity (I’ll be writing about that soon). Regarding your second point… Much like people put their website or a phone number in ads, it would make sense to have a vanity for social profiles if they’re included. Doesn’t always make sense, but in some cases it does. I’m just asking that people think it through. Blows my mind that they haven’t. This help? 

  • http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog Leo Dimilo

    This is just my opinion but I would think that people who are clicking on the Facebook or Twitter icons are already knowledgeable as to what they are there for and would be no different than say the retweet icons at the end of an article.

    And the bigger question is to what expense are you doing to the central motive for the ad itself by creating ads inside of ads? 

    I’m not saying I disagree with you here…just mulling these thoughts outloud…