Integrity, Social Media and Business: One Big Uncomfortable Family

By , 16 December, 2009, 13 Comments

I had a serendipitous moment yesterday while (finally) writing this post. I saw a tweet come up from one of my peeps, Albert Maruggi (@AlbertMaruggi) that simplified my thoughts a bit (thanks Albert!). Our Twitter conversation reads:

как может уволиться член правления какое наказание за проезд на знак формы защиты собственности в рф выплата ущерба за дтп суд изменения счета в году сколько собственников у приватизированной квартиры что нужно иметь иностранцу что бы работать в рк лишение прав и окончание срока их действия дисциплинарное наказание в период отпуска уголовный кодекс сроки давности нотариус гражданский время работы отсутствие активов для выплаты доли

Albert: “Lincoln said, ‘Character is what you do when people are not looking.’ Social media are the constant eyes focused on brands. Now what?”

Me:“Integrity better be a priority (smiley face).”

Albert: “Remember what JR Ewing of Dallas TV fame said, ‘Once you get passed honesty, integrity is a piece of cake.’”

Integrity is something I think a lot about. Growing up, “insides matching outsides” (my preferred definition of integrity) was at the top of the “principles you better practice list.” Over the years, that little phrase has transformed into a question I ask myself regularly as well as what I expect from my surroundings (business relationships, employer, professional associations, personal life, etc.). Why? Well, because without truth, what’s the point? How can anything truly successful be built? I don’t think I really need to make a case for what a lack of integrity and honesty leaves in its wake. Just watch the news or read the paper (yes I just said news and paper) and you’ll find many examples of integrity breech.

Integrity has found its rightful place at the head of the business communication revolution table. Words like authentic, transparent and genuine (all synonymous with insides matching outsides) are among the most popular vocabulary words of today. Not because people do these things particularly well, but because the act of exuding these characteristics is highly desirable, especially as it pertains to communicating. Integrity is what we crave and expect in our interactions with other humans (brands) — and we should expect nothing less.

Technology innovations (such as social networks) and Web 2.0 culture (collaboration culture) not only foster this dynamic, but have the ability to hold communicators and businesses accountable to act with integrity, which has ultimately sent a large percentage of folks into panic mode. For the majority, it’s incredibly scary, as we’ve comfortably been living in the one-to-many culture for quite a while, so the ability for anyone to take hold of a message and say whatever they like whenever they like is a tad overwhelming. And why wouldn’t it be? It’s not necessarily businesses that struggle with this are lacking integrity or being dishonest, more so that they are used to talking with people in a much different way as the result of age, business type, poor teaching or advising and the list goes on. The humanizing of brands is in full swing and many company heads are slowly starting to realize that the behavior shift in people (consumers) and the preferred way to communicate is here to stay.

The intersection of new communication tools, like blogs, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. and good ‘ole traditional marketing-communication practice present the ability to do more better, if we choose.

In answer to Albert’s comment/question, “Lincoln said, ‘Character is what you do when people are not looking.’  Social media are the constant eyes focused on brands. Now what?” I think it’s very important to reflect upon a few things here when thinking about engaging in the world of social media:

First: If your character needs an overhaul (meaning, you are dishonest and lame or have other issues), take a look at yourself (business) and take responsibility and action (emphasis on action) for what you can do better.

Second: Consider what you value and how you want to convey that (how it plays into your overall business communication strategy).

The sad reality here is that people are hopping into a very serious set of communication tools without a defined communication strategy or real distinction of what their company or brand truly represents. In essence, lacking a solid foundation from which to build something — not mapping out how to translate their insides (company culture) to the outside (public) successfully.

The next decade will be fascinating to watch. Not just which businesses succeed and how, but how the marketing-communications discipline will change as the result of ongoing innovation and its ability to empower people to hold business and other powerful entities accountable through transparent platforms. It’s just the beginning of it all and can only get more interesting.

What are your thoughts?

email
Related Posts
  • Integrity-sucks

    Have your mobile track your life automatically.
    Maybe this is only the beginning?

    http://market.android.com/details?id=se.matjosoft.autostatus

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    He's good people. Here's hoping to not disappoint:-)

  • http://chrisbrogan.com Chris Brogan

    You know, I had coffee with Albert today, so it's nice to read about him here. Feels like continuity to it all.

    Looking forward to your next post. : )

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Sean -
    Thank you so much for posting a comment here – and I'm sorry it's taken over a week to respond. I think the caveat is that people will often compromise on personal integrity because they're human:-) And definitely when money is involved. RE: Disclosure and blogging. I think it's hilarious that people wigged so much when the FTC rulings came out a few months back. To a degree a lot of the rules are common commonsensical. Like most things, just do the right thing and you'll be fine. The part of the upset I do understand because what everyone feels is right and wrong is also different, a whole other story:-) RE: Banking and finance – the animal of that industry has many layers and intricacies unlike any others. Also, the part of the story we don't know is what actions Jane took to correct their raising her interest rate. While I can assume what the outcome was, who knows if they would reconsider her interest rate upon further investigation. Loved your comment and thoughts here. Again, my apologies for not responding sooner. I hope you are having an awesome holiday season Sean!

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Keith -
    Thanks for taking the time to comment:) I especially liked what you had to say, “I am encouraged and like seeing companies that want to get back to building genuine relationships with their consumers! There are a lot more everyday, which is starting to rebuild that integrity and honesty in the relationship we once had with our products and services.” I dig it Keith. Those that are bringing things back to basics are those that are going to do very well – and be able to feel really amazing about it. It's not idealistic, it's the way business should be (IMHO). Thanks for your great thoughts.

  • seanwilliams

    Lisa, this indeed is an interesting post. The caveat is that people often will compromise on personal integrity when money is involved. I don't do sponsored posts, but there are many who do, and many of those who don't even disclose that they've been paid. This phenomenon will become more prevalent as social media platforms continue to burgeon.

    The case that Albert cites leads me to a comment about borrower integrity. The Journal today has a story about people voluntarily defaulting on their mortgages because they owe more than the house is worth. This, despite having signed a promissory note (literally, a promise to pay). One gent justified walking out on his promise by blaming the banks for fostering the real estate bubble — he wasn't deceived by the bank, he just decided he wanted out.

    Banks manage risk, and evaluating the likelihood of increased risk is part of that management process. Jane obviously is having some issues, and whilst I won't agree that 22.99% is an appropriate interest rate, I fully understand the bank's desire to price her credit for the risk exposed by her declining credit score.

    apologies for the nosebleed post… Lisa, I'm happy to have discovered your blog. Very intellect-ual…
    ;-)
    @commammo

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Keith -
    Thanks for taking the time to comment:) I especially liked what you had to say, “I am encouraged and like seeing companies that want to get back to building genuine relationships with their consumers! There are a lot more everyday, which is starting to rebuild that integrity and honesty in the relationship we once had with our products and services.” I dig it Keith. Those that are bringing things back to basics are those that are going to do very well – and be able to feel really amazing about it. It's not idealistic, it's the way business should be (IMHO). Thanks for your great thoughts.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Integrity, Social Media and Business: One Big Uncomfortable Family - Communications Passionista -- Topsy.com

  • seanwilliams

    Lisa, this indeed is an interesting post. The caveat is that people often will compromise on personal integrity when money is involved. I don't do sponsored posts, but there are many who do, and many of those who don't even disclose that they've been paid. This phenomenon will become more prevalent as social media platforms continue to burgeon.

    The case that Albert cites leads me to a comment about borrower integrity. The Journal today has a story about people voluntarily defaulting on their mortgages because they owe more than the house is worth. This, despite having signed a promissory note (literally, a promise to pay). One gent justified walking out on his promise by blaming the banks for fostering the real estate bubble — he wasn't deceived by the bank, he just decided he wanted out.

    Banks manage risk, and evaluating the likelihood of increased risk is part of that management process. Jane obviously is having some issues, and whilst I won't agree that 22.99% is an appropriate interest rate, I fully understand the bank's desire to price her credit for the risk exposed by her declining credit score.

    apologies for the nosebleed post… Lisa, I'm happy to have discovered your blog. Very intellect-ual…
    ;-)
    @commammo

  • tonymartin

    All organizations, large and small must never lose sight of the “human factor” in the work they do and the service they provide. It's not wise to be “efficient” with people or look for ways to take the warmth out of any kind of customer interaction. However, when large numbers of people are involved and efficiency is a real factor – there is no easy answer as to how to interact in a warm way… especially when negative messages (like the one Albert referenced) must be disseminated. Love the blog LuLu – good message and great questions.

  • http://twitter.com/lulugrimm Lisa Grimm

    Albert –
    Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. I always appreciate your candor and no BS approach to everything. I chose the title “One Big Uncomfortable Family,” specifically to imply the fact that this arrangement (ultimately human business) is not natural for most. My dad recently said, “You know some things just don't mean what they used to, like the saying 'And you can take that to the bank!'” It's so true. Banks and finance in general are just not regarded the same as they used to be. Why? Because they're shady. Between whistle blowing and the media (mainstream and citizen) coverage, banking and finance has been held accountable for its mistakes and missteps (we won't get into the bailouts and true accountability to the people). My point here is this: It can only continue to change. If (big) business does not begin to think about truth, fairness and beyond they very well could face demise. Technology and the behavioral shift in people will continue. Tools will change, sentiment will change, so business will have to acclimate, die or actually innovate to keep up. I think social media advocates aren't so much naive as hopeful that (big) business will turn the lights on and realize they could really elevate the quality of relationships they do have with their ginormous audiences (and still make money, if not more), but if the foundation of human isn't laid, then that outcome is not likely, hence the fascination with how this will change business in the next 10 to 20 years. As for Jane – I feel that at least one credit card company who gets it and leverages Jane's dissatisfaction (providing she talks about it somewhere) to improve its business and give Jane what she's looking for. Jane’s ridiculous and common experience has a forum somewhere or could be easily created — and if the right person is listening, well then there’s opportunity there. If you suck, people will know, and those people will take action based on the fact they see you sucking— and eventually this will happen enough that you will be forced to evaluate your suck factor and make some changes. Thanks again Albert for your comment.

  • keithprivette

    This is a great perspective and everyone should stop for a moment and examine themselves first! Are you doing things that have integrity and honesty in your everyday life? If yes then you need to apply that same thought process to work. The old days of spin, crafting sales message because you think your consumers are drones, and pitching vaporware are OVER! There are too many outlets for research to uncover the tactics you are using as not being done with integrity and honesty.

    I think this is the awaking companies are having about hawking their products and services, people see things they like, they investigate, then they purchase. The investigation is key to this, if that part reveals shotty tactics (believe we will find it) to just sell without care, integrity, and honesty your done! We are as a collective community helping each other with decision making, which is a very powerful building block for relationship building and trust making!

    I think companies are realizing fancy commercials, billboards, product placements do not trigger the same responses as they once did. The response is “ooooo I like that, let me check yelp, twitter, google, bing, or facebook for a second opinion” Before we would purchase and hope for the best because we inherently trusted the people we bought from, well that trust has been broken with many situations over the years and with the advent of the social scene rightfully so! We have collectively encouraged each other to get smart together to take back our communities.

    I am encourage and like seeing the companies that want to get back to building genuine relationships with their consumers! There are a lot more everyday, which is starting to rebuild that integrity and honesty in the relationship we once had with our products and services.

    Great post Lisa you have a great voice keep posting and I encourage everyone to follow her she has some of the best perspectives out here on the intertubes! I am glad she is out here with her voice! You will be too!

  • http://www.providentpartners.net/blog Albert_Maruggi

    Now the integrity you speak of, is it about this concept of relationship between consumer and company? It is about this phrase “to be human” in your brand?

    Let's examine the “relationship” between a financial institution (bank or credit card) and the consumer in today's context of social media. There are hundreds of thousands if not millions of people in the following situation. Jane Dough has a relationship with say Target's Red Card. She pays her bills monthly and has an automatic payment set up to ensure that the bill is paid in full at the end of the month.

    Jane also has a declining credit score for any of a number of reasons that you can imagine in today's economic climate. However, Jane has never been late with Target. Jane gets a letter in the mail this month of holiday purchases saying something like “Periodically we review our customers credit reports and along with recent changes in legislation affecting financial institutions have made changes to your account. Given the current situation your interest rate has be readjusted, according to the terms and conditions of the Target Red Card, to 22.99% on balances of new purchases.” Twenty-two percent! I can do better from my cousin Vinny.

    So this relationship that Jane demonstrated over the last year of no late payments, setting up automatic payments, and being regular customer, in a word means JACK. Sorry I could have picked a more sophisticated word to use, but JACK is the best one in this case.

    “Being human” really? Social media advocates I stand with you most of the time, but in the case of financial institutions and the volatile environment, this is a naive human notion applied to an in-human institution is an inanimate entity called a “Corporation” whose primary, if not sole obligation is to its shareholder. Those are the humans corporations value most. It's not about being human, it's about the computer generated credit report and your sorry financial situation Jane, as temporary as it may be. It's not about your relationship over the past year, unblemished though it may be, it's about their risk and profits. Human or not, that's the stark reality.